[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5298ADD1.7050203@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 10:08:01 -0500
From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
To: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
CC: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
"ivan.khoronzhuk" <ivan.khoronzhuk@...com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] memory: ti-aemif: add bindings for AEMIF driver
On Friday 29 November 2013 09:56 AM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> Hi Jean-Christophe,
>
> On 11/22/2013 08:42 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
>> On 21:03 Wed 20 Nov , ivan.khoronzhuk wrote:
>>> On 11/20/2013 08:21 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
>>>>> + the chip select signal.
>>>>> + Minimum value is 1 (0 treated as 1).
>>>>> +
>>>>> +- ti,cs-wsetup: write setup width, ns
>>>>> + Time between the beginning of a memory cycle
>>>>> + and the activation of write strobe.
>>>>> + Minimum value is 1 (0 treated as 1).
>>>>> +
>>>>> +- ti,cs-wstrobe: write strobe width, ns
>>>>> + Time between the activation and deactivation of
>>>>> + the write strobe.
>>>>> + Minimum value is 1 (0 treated as 1).
>>>>> +
>>>>> +- ti,cs-whold: write hold width, ns
>>>>> + Time between the deactivation of the write
>>>>> + strobe and the end of the cycle (which may be
>>>>> + either an address change or the deactivation of
>>>>> + the chip select signal.
>>>>> + Minimum value is 1 (0 treated as 1).
>>>>> +
>>>>> +If any of the above parameters are absent, current parameter value will be taken
>>>>> +from the corresponding HW reg.
>>>>> +
>>>>> +The name for cs node must be in format csN, where N is the cs number.
>>>>
>>>> this is wired we should use reg instead to represent the cs as done for SPI
>>>> or a an other property
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> J.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ok, I will add new property cs-chipselect like following :
>>>
>>> ti,cs-chipselect: number of chipselect. Indicates on the
>>> aemif driver which chipselect is used
>>> for accessing the memory.
>>> For compatibles "ti,davinci-aemif" and
>>> "ti,keystone-aemif" it can be in range [0-3].
>>> For compatible "ti,omap-L138-aemif" range is [2-5].
>>>
>>> Is it OK?
>>
>> yes
>>
>> I just have one issue the whole memory concept
>>
>> for me we should do as done on pinctrl have a phandle on the device that
>> require it and handle it at device core level
>>
>> as the memory controller is not necessarely on the same bus as the memory
>> device them selves
>
> Could you clarify your point a bit, pls?
> Are you talking about external ASRAM, NOR and NAND chips wired to CS interface?
>
Thats probably what he means.
The mtd devices can be interface with different memory controllers having different
layouts to set-up timing registers. If these layouts were standard, then it would
have been possible to manage the information at the core layers.
Regards,
Santosh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists