linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] usermodehelper: kill ____call_usermodehelper()->set_cpus_allowed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131129164904.GA5124@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 29 Nov 2013 17:49:04 +0100
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, zhang.yi20@....com.cn,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] usermodehelper: kill
	____call_usermodehelper()->set_cpus_allowed_ptr()

Hi Tejun,

On 11/29, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> Hey, Oleg.
>
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 08:33:49PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > @@ -208,13 +208,9 @@ static int ____call_usermodehelper(void *data)
> >  	spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
> >  	flush_signal_handlers(current, 1);
> >  	spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
> > -
> > -	/* We can run anywhere, unlike our parent keventd(). */
> > -	set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpu_all_mask);
>
> I don't think this is correct on numa machines where unbound workers
> are NUMA-node affine by default.

Aaah, I see. And you even mentioned this before, but I didn't pay
attention.

Thank!

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/