[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131129165656.GF4266@pd.tnic>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 17:56:56 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, mjg59@...f.ucam.org, hpa@...or.com,
James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, vgoyal@...hat.com,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, horms@...ge.net.au,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, greg@...ah.com, matt@...sole-pimps.org,
toshi.kani@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/12] x86: reserve setup_data ranges late after
parsing memmap cmdline
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 04:35:52PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> Is below changes ok to you?
Almost perfect! Just a micro-nitpick below:
> Currently e820_reserve_setup_data is called before parsing early params,
> it works in normal case. But for memmap=exactmap, the final memory ranges
> are created after parsing memmap= cmdline params, so the previous
> e820_reserve_setup_data has no effect. For example for setup_data ranges
s/ for/,/
> will still be marked as normal system ram, thus when later sysfs driver
> ioremap them kernel will warn about mapping normal ram.
>
> This patch fix it by moving the e820_reserve_setup_data callback after
> parsing early params so they can be set as reserved ranges and later
> ioremap will be fine with it.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists