[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZtfsvgYNMUnuwiYL=0dVe6KDPV92Ri0TpTHL8gRJeqkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 08:46:32 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
DLOS <davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] gpio: davinci: add OF support
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com> wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 November 2013 06:03 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> Actually, the same was proposed by Linus, but we've tried avoid such huge rework -
>> by switching to one irq_domain per all banks for example.
>
> I didn't really read that proposal from Linus so if two people
> independently suggested the same thing, there must be something worth
> considering there :)
>From a GPIO POV it's not such a big deal really, this approach is fine
and the important thing is that we progress toward a more standard
driver... it's more a question for the DT people IMO. I really like the
current patch set.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists