[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131130033732.GM22729@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 22:37:32 -0500
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, stable@...nel.org,
azurit@...ox.sk, mm-commits@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [merged]
mm-memcg-handle-non-error-oom-situations-more-gracefully.patch removed from
-mm tree
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 10:12:55AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 27-11-13 18:33:53, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> [...]
> > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > index 13b9d0f..5f9e467 100644
> > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > @@ -2675,7 +2675,7 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_try_charge(struct mm_struct *mm,
> > goto bypass;
> >
> > if (unlikely(task_in_memcg_oom(current)))
> > - goto bypass;
> > + goto nomem;
> >
> > /*
> > * We always charge the cgroup the mm_struct belongs to.
>
> Yes, I think we really want this. Plan to send a patch? The first charge
> failure due to OOM shouldn't be papered over by a later attempt if we
> didn't get through mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize yet.
Sure thing. Will send this to Andrew on Monday.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists