[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1385816013.4327.1.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 13:53:33 +0100
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com>
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
rkuo <rkuo@...eaurora.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: mac80211: tx.c: be sure of 'sdata->vif.type' must
be NL80211_IFTYPE_AP when be in NL80211_IFTYPE_AP case
On Sat, 2013-11-30 at 19:59 +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 11/29/2013 11:38 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> >
> >> +++ b/net/mac80211/tx.c
> >> @@ -1814,8 +1814,9 @@ netdev_tx_t ieee80211_subif_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
> >> break;
> >> /* fall through */
> >> case NL80211_IFTYPE_AP:
> >> - if (sdata->vif.type == NL80211_IFTYPE_AP)
> >> - chanctx_conf = rcu_dereference(sdata->vif.chanctx_conf);
> >> + if (sdata->vif.type != NL80211_IFTYPE_AP)
> >> + goto fail_rcu;
> >> + chanctx_conf = rcu_dereference(sdata->vif.chanctx_conf);
> >
> > This change is completely wrong.
> >
>
> Oh, it is.
>
> Hmm... for me, this work flow still can be implemented with a little
> clearer way (at least it will avoid related warning):
>
> -------------------------diff begin------------------------------
>
> diff --git a/net/mac80211/tx.c b/net/mac80211/tx.c
> index c558b24..7076128 100644
> --- a/net/mac80211/tx.c
> +++ b/net/mac80211/tx.c
> @@ -1810,14 +1810,14 @@ netdev_tx_t ieee80211_subif_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
> if (!chanctx_conf)
> goto fail_rcu;
> band = chanctx_conf->def.chan->band;
> - if (sta)
> - break;
> - /* fall through */
> + if (!sta)
> + goto try_next;
> + break;
> case NL80211_IFTYPE_AP:
> - if (sdata->vif.type == NL80211_IFTYPE_AP)
> - chanctx_conf = rcu_dereference(sdata->vif.chanctx_conf);
> + chanctx_conf = rcu_dereference(sdata->vif.chanctx_conf);
> if (!chanctx_conf)
> goto fail_rcu;
> +try_next:
I don't think that's better than the (fairly obvious) fall-through, and
has a pretty odd goto. Also, depending on the compiler, it still knows
the previous case label and doesn't warn.
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists