linux-kernel - Re: device-tree based boot on linux-n900 branch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 1 Dec 2013 10:50:18 +0100
From:	Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, sre@...g0.de
Cc:	sre@...ian.org, kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: device-tree based boot on linux-n900 branch

On Sunday 01 December 2013 00:15:32 Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Sat 2013-11-30 18:29:38, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> > 
> > > > > > Hi, I already have this patch prepared for 3.13.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Cool :-). Do you plan to publish / is there 3.13 based
> > > > > tree I could pull somewhere?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > 
> > > > > 								Pavel
> > > > 
> > > > Yes, I will rebase n900 patches on top of next 3.13 rc
> > > > release which will have some patches already included.
> > > > I have not created full n900 3.13 branch yet.
> > > 
> > > New branch 3.13-rc2 is now on gitorious linux-n900 tree:
> > > git://gitorious.org/linux-n900/linux-n900.git
> > 
> > Branch seems to be named "v3.13-rc2-n900". Thanks!
> 
> Is this one expected to boot in devicetree-based setup? If so,
> does someone have .config?
> 
> Thanks,
> 								Pavel

No, this my tree has rx51_defconfig which is used for classic 
booting with board files.

Sebastian, can you create new rx51_defconfig or at least patch 
which enable DT booting? Also some steps how to compile DT kernel 
will be usefull (maybe on http://elinux.org/N900).

-- 
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@...il.com

Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)