[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131201125604.GH16796@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2013 13:56:04 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Scott Norton <scott.norton@...com>,
Tom Vaden <tom.vaden@...com>,
Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@...com>,
Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 0/5] futex: Allow lockless empty check of hashbucket
plist in futex_wake()
On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 01:10:22PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> But more importantly, since these are all NUMA systems, would it make
> sense to create per node hashes on NUMA? Each futex would be enqueued
> into the hash belonging to its own page's node.
Can't do that; we hash on vaddr, the actual page can move between nodes
while a futex is queued.
This would mean that the waiting futex is queued on another node than
the waker is looking.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists