[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <00000142b54f6694-c51e81b1-f1a2-483b-a1ce-a2d4cb6b155c-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 21:55:49 +0000
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: netfilter: active obj WARN when cleaning up
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013, Greg KH wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
>
> That looks good, if you fix the indentation issue :)
Huh?
> > Index: linux/include/linux/slub_def.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux.orig/include/linux/slub_def.h 2013-12-02 13:31:07.395905824 -0600
> > +++ linux/include/linux/slub_def.h 2013-12-02 13:31:07.385906101 -0600
> > @@ -98,4 +98,8 @@ struct kmem_cache {
> > struct kmem_cache_node *node[MAX_NUMNODES];
> > };
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS
> > +#define SLAB_SUPPORTS_SYSFS
>
> Why even define this? Why not just use CONFIG_SYSFS?
Because not all slab allocators currently support SYSFS and there is the
need to have different code now in slab_common.c depending on the
configuration of the allocator.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists