[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <529D0896.2090707@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 17:24:22 -0500
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Metin Doslu <metin@...usdata.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Ozgun Erdogan <ozgun@...usdata.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Roman Gushchin <klamm@...dex-team.ru>,
Ryan Mallon <rmallon@...il.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/9] lib: radix-tree: radix_tree_delete_item()
On 12/02/2013 02:21 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Provide a function that does not just delete an entry at a given
> index, but also allows passing in an expected item. Delete only if
> that item is still located at the specified index.
>
> This is handy when lockless tree traversals want to delete entries as
> well because they don't have to do an second, locked lookup to verify
> the slot has not changed under them before deleting the entry.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists