linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 0/6] perf tools: Add perf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87wqjnoebd.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date:	Mon, 02 Dec 2013 17:19:18 +0900
From:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/6] perf tools: Add perf_evlist errno

Hi Jiri,

On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 12:45:04 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> hi,
> Andi reported wrong error message for :S modifier
> on kernel without event ID ioctl support.
>
> The reason was that the ioctl failed, but the error was
> printed like the mmap would:
>
>     $ perf.old record -e '{cycles,cache-misses}:S' ls
>     failed to mmap with 25 (Inappropriate ioctl for device)
>     ls: Terminated

I see same confusing error message..

>
> I experimentally added sort of 'libc errno' interface for
> perf_evlist to be able to get proper error message, like:
>
>     $ perf record -e '{cycles,cache-misses}:S' ls
>     Cannot read event group on this kernel.
>     Please consider kernel update (v3.12+).
>     ls: Terminated
>
> I'm not sure about this approach. Maybe it'd be better be more
> global..? So before throwing this out, sending it as RFC ;-)

I like it. :)  We still need to improve this user-visible error handling.

But what you mean by 'more global'?  I think the evlist APIs are pretty
global alreay.  And we have same error handling in perf_target code too.

But I think it'd be better making it thread-safe even though it's not
needed for now.  The code is growing really fast.. ;-)

Thanks,
Namhyung

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/