linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH net-next] xen-netback: Fix pull size in checksum_setup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9AAE0902D5BC7E449B7C8E4E778ABCD019BC2B@AMSPEX01CL01.citrite.net>
Date:	Mon, 2 Dec 2013 09:42:34 +0000
From:	Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@...rix.com>
To:	Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@...rix.com>,
	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>,
	"xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Jonathan Davies" <Jonathan.Davies@...rix.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next] xen-netback: Fix pull size in
 checksum_setup_ip*

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zoltan Kiss
> Sent: 29 November 2013 20:26
> To: Ian Campbell; Wei Liu; xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org;
> netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Jonathan Davies;
> Paul Durrant
> Cc: Zoltan Kiss
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] xen-netback: Fix pull size in
> checksum_setup_ip*
> 
> Or would it make sense to drop header_size and use off + something as
> function parameters?
> 

Possibly best not to top-post to your own thread ;-)

Agreed; now that we've gone from mostly 3 variable additions to 2, I don't think we need header_size to neaten things up any more.

  Paul

> Zoli
> 
> On 29/11/13 18:56, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> > Before checksum setup we need to make sure we have enough data in
> linear
> > buffer, so we do a pull if not. The calculation of the required data counts
> > with skb->network_header, which is the headroom size actually. This is not
> > necessary, and can cause unreasonable pulling. I've also removed
> > MAX_IPOPTLEN, as we only need the base header at that point.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@...rix.com>
> >
> > ---
> >   drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c |   24 ++++++++----------------
> >   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c b/drivers/net/xen-
> netback/netback.c
> > index 919b650..adadf76 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> > @@ -1169,8 +1169,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ip(struct xenvif *vif,
> struct sk_buff *skb,
> >
> >   	off = sizeof(struct iphdr);
> >
> > -	header_size = skb->network_header + off + MAX_IPOPTLEN;
> > -	maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size);
> > +	maybe_pull_tail(skb, off);
> >
> >   	off = iph->ihl * 4;
> >
> > @@ -1183,8 +1182,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ip(struct xenvif *vif,
> struct sk_buff *skb,
> >   		if (recalculate_partial_csum) {
> >   			struct tcphdr *tcph = tcp_hdr(skb);
> >
> > -			header_size = skb->network_header +
> > -				off +
> > +			header_size = off +
> >   				sizeof(struct tcphdr);
> >   			maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size);
> >
> > @@ -1201,8 +1199,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ip(struct xenvif *vif,
> struct sk_buff *skb,
> >   		if (recalculate_partial_csum) {
> >   			struct udphdr *udph = udp_hdr(skb);
> >
> > -			header_size = skb->network_header +
> > -				off +
> > +			header_size = off +
> >   				sizeof(struct udphdr);
> >   			maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size);
> >
> > @@ -1241,8 +1238,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ipv6(struct xenvif *vif,
> struct sk_buff *skb,
> >
> >   	off = sizeof(struct ipv6hdr);
> >
> > -	header_size = skb->network_header + off;
> > -	maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size);
> > +	maybe_pull_tail(skb, off);
> >
> >   	nexthdr = ipv6h->nexthdr;
> >
> > @@ -1254,8 +1250,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ipv6(struct xenvif *vif,
> struct sk_buff *skb,
> >   		case IPPROTO_ROUTING: {
> >   			struct ipv6_opt_hdr *hp = (void *)(skb->data + off);
> >
> > -			header_size = skb->network_header +
> > -				off +
> > +			header_size = off +
> >   				sizeof(struct ipv6_opt_hdr);
> >   			maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size);
> >
> > @@ -1266,8 +1261,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ipv6(struct xenvif *vif,
> struct sk_buff *skb,
> >   		case IPPROTO_AH: {
> >   			struct ip_auth_hdr *hp = (void *)(skb->data + off);
> >
> > -			header_size = skb->network_header +
> > -				off +
> > +			header_size = off +
> >   				sizeof(struct ip_auth_hdr);
> >   			maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size);
> >
> > @@ -1305,8 +1299,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ipv6(struct xenvif *vif,
> struct sk_buff *skb,
> >   		if (recalculate_partial_csum) {
> >   			struct tcphdr *tcph = tcp_hdr(skb);
> >
> > -			header_size = skb->network_header +
> > -				off +
> > +			header_size = off +
> >   				sizeof(struct tcphdr);
> >   			maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size);
> >
> > @@ -1324,8 +1317,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ipv6(struct xenvif *vif,
> struct sk_buff *skb,
> >   		if (recalculate_partial_csum) {
> >   			struct udphdr *udph = udp_hdr(skb);
> >
> > -			header_size = skb->network_header +
> > -				off +
> > +			header_size = off +
> >   				sizeof(struct udphdr);
> >   			maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size);
> >
> >

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/