[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <65B0AD57-F44C-4360-916C-16D26884B09C@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 10:54:51 +0100
From: Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>
To: Zhouyi Zhou <yizhouzhou@....ac.cn>
Cc: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org mailing list" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Ben Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: ping: re: [PATCH 1/1] kernel code that do not handle NULL return of kmem_cache_zalloc
On 02.12.2013, at 04:07, Zhouyi Zhou <yizhouzhou@....ac.cn> wrote:
> ping
>> I do a grep for kmem_cache_zalloc and kmem_cache_alloc
>> in kernel tree, and find some code do not handle NULL
>> return of kmem_cache_zalloc correctly
>>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou <yizhouzhou@....ac.cn>
Thanks a lot for the patch. I'd assume we want something slightly more clever even, similar to Paul's d78bca729.
Please beware that it's usually not a good idea to post patches that span multiple subtrees. I don't want to apply a patch to my kvm tree that touches jffs2 for example, as that's out of my scope. It usually makes a maintainer's life easier if you split up a patch like this according to tree responsibilities.
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists