[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <529BE72C.9030805@gtsys.com.hk>
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 09:49:32 +0800
From: Chris Ruehl <chris.ruehl@...ys.com.hk>
To: Peter Chen <Peter.Chen@...escale.com>
CC: "alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com"
<alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3 v3] usb: chipidea: Fix Internal error: : 808 [#1]
ARM related to STS flag
On Saturday, November 30, 2013 06:20 PM, Peter Chen wrote:
>
>>
>> usb: chipidea: Fix Internal error: : 808 [#1] ARM related to STS flag
>>
>> * init the sts flag to 0 (missed)
>> * Set PORTCS_STS only if VUSB_HS_PHY_TYPE> 1
>> otherwise the register is ReadOnly
>> * Set/Reset correct BIT(28)/BIT(29) for STS
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chris Ruehl<chris.ruehl@...ys.com.hk>
>> ---
>> drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c b/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c
>> index 5075407..2c634c1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c
>> @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ static int hw_device_init(struct ci_hdrc *ci, void
>> __iomem *base)
>>
>> static void hw_phymode_configure(struct ci_hdrc *ci)
>> {
>> - u32 portsc, lpm, sts;
>> + u32 portsc, lpm, sts = 0;
>>
>> switch (ci->platdata->phy_mode) {
>> case USBPHY_INTERFACE_MODE_UTMI:
>> @@ -273,10 +273,24 @@ static void hw_phymode_configure(struct ci_hdrc *ci)
>>
>> if (ci->hw_bank.lpm) {
>> hw_write(ci, OP_DEVLC, DEVLC_PTS(7) | DEVLC_PTW, lpm);
>> - hw_write(ci, OP_DEVLC, DEVLC_STS, sts);
>> + if ( sts )
>> + hw_write(ci, OP_DEVLC, DEVLC_STS, BIT(28));
>> + else
>> + hw_write(ci, OP_DEVLC, DEVLC_STS, ~BIT(28));
>> } else {
>> hw_write(ci, OP_PORTSC, PORTSC_PTS(7) | PORTSC_PTW, portsc);
>> - hw_write(ci, OP_PORTSC, PORTSC_STS, sts);
>> + if (((portsc>> 30)& 0x3)> 1) {
>> + if (sts) {
>> + hw_write(ci, OP_PORTSC, PORTSC_STS, BIT(29));
>> + }
>> + else {
>> + portsc = (ioread32(ci->hw_bank.regmap[OP_PORTSC])
>> + & PORTSC_STS);
>> + if (portsc)
>> + hw_write(ci, OP_PORTSC, PORTSC_STS,
>> + ~BIT(29));
>> + }
>> + }
>> }
>> }
>>
>> --
>
> At my chipidea datasheet, the VUSB_HS_PHY_SERIAL is at HWGENERAL (bit[10..11]),
> We are still not sure the portsc_sts is needed to set or clear, and how to do
> it. My suggestion is just use v2 patch (except fixing one code style problem)
>
> Peter
>
Peter,
Thanks you for your comments.
If you have a look into the function hw_write() you will see that there is no
effect if hw_write(...,sts) is called with sts=0/1, because the mask will cut
off all bits beside BIT(29).
I used BIT(29) rather then PORTCS_STS to make it more clear what going on.
A write to PORTCS will always be "0" for the STS Register no matter if sts is 1
or 0 within Patch v2. Patch v3 will take care of the registers bit position and
set 1 or 0 to PORTCS_STS.
I used the imx27 reference manual Capital 30.8.1.5.12 PORTSCx.
Please comment.
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists