linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: tegra: Header file for pinctrl constants

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131202142522.GA17566@ulmo.nvidia.com>
Date:	Mon, 2 Dec 2013 15:25:23 +0100
From:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
Cc:	rob.herring@...xeda.com, swarren@...dotorg.org, pawel.moll@....com,
	mark.rutland@....com, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk,
	linux@....linux.org.uk, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: tegra: Header file for pinctrl constants

On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 07:25:01PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:

I think the canonical subject prefix for Tegra is:

	ARM: tegra:

Perhaps also mention that you "Add" the header file? Like so:

	ARM: tegra: Add header file for pinctrl constants

> Defines pincontrol constants to use from Tegra's DTS file

Perhaps: "This new header file defines..."? "DTS files"

> for tegra pincontrol properties option.

"Tegra"

> 
> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
> ---
>  include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-tegra.h |   65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-tegra.h
> 
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-tegra.h b/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-tegra.h
[...]
> +/* Pull up/down/normal */
> +#define TEGRA_PIN_PUPD_NORMAL				0
> +#define TEGRA_PIN_PUPD_PULL_DOWN			1
> +#define TEGRA_PIN_PUPD_PULL_UP				2

Perhaps these would be easier to use as:

	#define TEGRA_PIN_PULL_NONE	0
	#define TEGRA_PIN_PULL_DOWN	1
	#define TEGRA_PIN_PULL_UP	2

?

> +/* Tristate/normal */
> +#define TEGRA_PIN_NORMAL				0
> +#define TEGRA_PIN_TRISTATE				1
> +
> +/* Rcv Sel enable/disable */
> +#define TEGRA_PIN_RCV_SEL_DISABLE			0
> +#define TEGRA_PIN_RCV_SEL_ENABLE			1
> +
> +/* Lock enable/disable */
> +#define TEGRA_PIN_LOCK_DISABLE				0
> +#define TEGRA_PIN_LOCK_ENABLE				1
> +
> +/* Open drain enable/disable */
> +#define TEGRA_PIN_OPEN_DRAIN_DISABLE			0
> +#define TEGRA_PIN_OPEN_DRAIN_ENABLE			1
> +
> +/* High speed mode */
> +#define TEGRA_PIN_DRIVE_HIGH_SPEED_MODE_DISABLE		0
> +#define TEGRA_PIN_DRIVE_HIGH_SPEED_MODE_ENABLE		1
> +
> +/* Schmitt enable/disable */
> +#define TEGRA_PIN_DRIVE_SCHMITT_DISABLE			0
> +#define TEGRA_PIN_DRIVE_SCHMITT_ENABLE			1

These are all boolean, so I wonder if perhaps we should be simply
defining a single pair and reuse that in different contexts:

	#define TEGRA_PIN_DISABLE	0
	#define TEGRA_PIN_ENABLE	1

The property names should provide enough context for them to be used
unambiguously.

Thierry

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped