lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131202145641.GB18642@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 2 Dec 2013 09:56:41 -0500
From:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To:	HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	"kexec@...ts.infradead.org" <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jingbai Ma <jingbai.ma@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] x86, apic, kexec, Documentation: Add disable_cpu_apic
 kernel parameter

On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 10:34:27AM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:

[..]
>  int generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version)
>  {
>  	int cpu, max = nr_cpu_ids;
> -	bool boot_cpu_detected = physid_isset(boot_cpu_physical_apicid,
> +	/*
> +	 * boot_cpu_physical_apicid is designed to have the apicid
> +	 * returned by read_apic_id(), i.e, the apicid of the
> +	 * currently booting-up processor. However, on some platforms,
> +	 * it is temporarilly modified by the apicid reported as BSP
> +	 * through MP table. Concretely:
> +	 *
> +	 * - arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c: MP_processor_info()
> +	 * - arch/x86/mm/amdtopology.c: amd_numa_init()
> +	 * - arch/x86/platform/visws/visws_quirks.c: MP_processor_info()
> +	 *
> +	 * This function is executed with the modified
> +	 * boot_cpu_physical_apicid. So, disabled_cpu_apicid kernel
> +	 * parameter doesn't work to disable APs on kdump 2nd kernel.
> +	 *
> +	 * Since fixing handling of boot_cpu_physical_apicid requires
> +	 * another discussion and tests on each platform, we leave it
> +	 * for now and here we use read_apic_id() directly in this
> +	 * function, generic_processor_info().
> +	 */
> +	bool boot_cpu_detected = physid_isset(read_apic_id(),
>  				phys_cpu_present_map);
>  
> +	if (disabled_cpu_apicid != BAD_APICID &&
> +	    disabled_cpu_apicid != read_apic_id() &&
> +	    disabled_cpu_apicid == apicid) {
> +		int thiscpu = num_processors + disabled_cpus;
> +
> +		pr_warning("ACPI: Disabling requested cpu."
> +			   " Processor %d/0x%x ignored.\n",
> +			   thiscpu, apicid);
> +
> +		disabled_cpus++;
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +	}
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * If boot cpu has not been detected yet, then only allow upto
>  	 * nr_cpu_ids - 1 processors and keep one slot free for boot cpu
>  	 */
>  	if (!boot_cpu_detected && num_processors >= nr_cpu_ids - 1 &&
> -	    apicid != boot_cpu_physical_apicid) {
> +	    apicid != read_apic_id()) {

I thought of using read_apic_id() only for disabled_cpu_apicid case.
Existing code seems to be working fine with boot_cpu_physical_apicid.
Instead of converting rest of the code to read_apic_id() we should fix
notion of boot_cpu_physical_id in a separate cleanup patch series.

IOW, can we please use read_apic_id() only for the case of
disabled_cpu_apicid and leave rest of the code untouched. And handle all
the cleanup in separate patch series.

Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ