linux-kernel - Re: netfilter: active obj WARN when cleaning up

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131202172615.GA4722@kroah.com>
Date:	Mon, 2 Dec 2013 09:26:15 -0800
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: netfilter: active obj WARN when cleaning up

On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 05:18:16PM +0000, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Dec 2013, Greg KH wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 04:33:20PM +0000, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > On Wed, 27 Nov 2013, Greg KH wrote:
> > >
> > > > Just make the kobject "dynamic" instead of embedded in struct kmem_cache
> > > > and all will be fine.  I can't believe this code has been broken for
> > > > this long.
> > >
> > > The slub code is was designed to use an embedded structure since we
> > > only get the kobj  pointer passed to us from sysfs. If kobj is not
> > > embedded then how can we get from the sysfs object to the kmem_cache
> > > structure from the sysfs callbacks? Sysfs was designed to have embedded
> > > objects as far as I can recall.
> >
> > Yes, it's designed to have embedded objects, so then use it that way and
> > clean up the structure when the kobject goes away.  Don't use a
> > different reference count for your structure than the one in the kobject
> > and think that all will be fine.
> 
> We need our own reference count. So we just have to defer the
> release of the kmem_cache struct until the ->release callback is
> triggered. The put of the embedded kobject must be the last action on the
> kmem_cache  structure which will then trigger release and that will
> trigger the kmem_cache_free().
> 

Ok, that sounds reasonable, or you can just create a "tiny" structure
for the kobject that has a pointer back to your kmem_cache structure
that you can then reference from the show/store functions.  Either is
fine with me.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/