[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <529CDEA6.8000807@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 12:25:26 -0700
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf report: Add --show-time-info option
On 12/2/13, 12:23 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 11:38:20PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
>> Hi Arnaldo,
>>
>> 2013-12-02 (월), 09:33 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo:
>>> Em Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 03:53:19PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
>>>> From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
>>>>
>>>> The --show-time-info option is for displaying elapsed sampling time
>>>
>>> Isn't that too long? Can't we use just --time/-t?
>>
>> Hmm.. interesting. Your previous feedback was to use longer and clearer
>> option name. :)
>
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/18/198
>
> Hey, longer and more descriptive names _when required_, in that case I
> thought that even being longer --show-task-events would be better, but
> here using --show-time-info the 'info' part looks superfluous, at least
> to me, hence my suggestion/question :-)
>
I thought -t/--time is going to be used to specify a time interval?
Collect data for N-seconds, analyze some middle M-seconds.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists