lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20131202191256.848650754@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Mon,  2 Dec 2013 11:14:33 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Akira Takeuchi <takeuchi.akr@...panasonic.com>,
	Kiyoshi Owada <owada.kiyoshi@...panasonic.com>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3.12 082/212] mm: ensure get_unmapped_area() returns higher address than mmap_min_addr

3.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Akira Takeuchi <takeuchi.akr@...panasonic.com>

commit 2afc745f3e3079ab16c826be4860da2529054dd2 upstream.

This patch fixes the problem that get_unmapped_area() can return illegal
address and result in failing mmap(2) etc.

In case that the address higher than PAGE_SIZE is set to
/proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr, the address lower than mmap_min_addr can be
returned by get_unmapped_area(), even if you do not pass any virtual
address hint (i.e.  the second argument).

This is because the current get_unmapped_area() code does not take into
account mmap_min_addr.

This leads to two actual problems as follows:

1. mmap(2) can fail with EPERM on the process without CAP_SYS_RAWIO,
   although any illegal parameter is not passed.

2. The bottom-up search path after the top-down search might not work in
   arch_get_unmapped_area_topdown().

Note: The first and third chunk of my patch, which changes "len" check,
are for more precise check using mmap_min_addr, and not for solving the
above problem.

[How to reproduce]

	--- test.c -------------------------------------------------
	#include <stdio.h>
	#include <unistd.h>
	#include <sys/mman.h>
	#include <sys/errno.h>

	int main(int argc, char *argv[])
	{
		void *ret = NULL, *last_map;
		size_t pagesize = sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE);

		do {
			last_map = ret;
			ret = mmap(0, pagesize, PROT_NONE,
				MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
	//		printf("ret=%p\n", ret);
		} while (ret != MAP_FAILED);

		if (errno != ENOMEM) {
			printf("ERR: unexpected errno: %d (last map=%p)\n",
			errno, last_map);
		}

		return 0;
	}
	---------------------------------------------------------------

	$ gcc -m32 -o test test.c
	$ sudo sysctl -w vm.mmap_min_addr=65536
	vm.mmap_min_addr = 65536
	$ ./test  (run as non-priviledge user)
	ERR: unexpected errno: 1 (last map=0x10000)

Signed-off-by: Akira Takeuchi <takeuchi.akr@...panasonic.com>
Signed-off-by: Kiyoshi Owada <owada.kiyoshi@...panasonic.com>
Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 mm/mmap.c |   10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/mm/mmap.c
@@ -1856,7 +1856,7 @@ arch_get_unmapped_area(struct file *filp
 	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
 	struct vm_unmapped_area_info info;
 
-	if (len > TASK_SIZE)
+	if (len > TASK_SIZE - mmap_min_addr)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	if (flags & MAP_FIXED)
@@ -1865,7 +1865,7 @@ arch_get_unmapped_area(struct file *filp
 	if (addr) {
 		addr = PAGE_ALIGN(addr);
 		vma = find_vma(mm, addr);
-		if (TASK_SIZE - len >= addr &&
+		if (TASK_SIZE - len >= addr && addr >= mmap_min_addr &&
 		    (!vma || addr + len <= vma->vm_start))
 			return addr;
 	}
@@ -1895,7 +1895,7 @@ arch_get_unmapped_area_topdown(struct fi
 	struct vm_unmapped_area_info info;
 
 	/* requested length too big for entire address space */
-	if (len > TASK_SIZE)
+	if (len > TASK_SIZE - mmap_min_addr)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	if (flags & MAP_FIXED)
@@ -1905,14 +1905,14 @@ arch_get_unmapped_area_topdown(struct fi
 	if (addr) {
 		addr = PAGE_ALIGN(addr);
 		vma = find_vma(mm, addr);
-		if (TASK_SIZE - len >= addr &&
+		if (TASK_SIZE - len >= addr && addr >= mmap_min_addr &&
 				(!vma || addr + len <= vma->vm_start))
 			return addr;
 	}
 
 	info.flags = VM_UNMAPPED_AREA_TOPDOWN;
 	info.length = len;
-	info.low_limit = PAGE_SIZE;
+	info.low_limit = max(PAGE_SIZE, mmap_min_addr);
 	info.high_limit = mm->mmap_base;
 	info.align_mask = 0;
 	addr = vm_unmapped_area(&info);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ