lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131202201705.GE17149@ghostprotocols.net>
Date:	Mon, 2 Dec 2013 17:17:05 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
To:	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf report: Add --show-time-info option

Em Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 12:58:35PM -0700, David Ahern escreveu:
> On 12/2/13, 12:38 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >Can you suggest a better name for the option being discussed?

> >Perhaps one of:

> >--show-event-time
> >--event-time

> >?
> 
> Why not just --event-time?

 
> Really should have dropped the 'show' from the recent perf-script
> change (just --task-events and --mmap-events).

Probably, yeah, Ingo made some point about using --show- for some reason,
Ingo?

One I can think of is that, in general, plain --feature can mean, at
least, one of --enable-feature and --show-feature, so perhaps that is
the point.

But then, perhaps that may be implied by the context, i.e.  when
recording, --feature means enable it, while when reporting, what we're
doing is basically _showing_ things, so --feature means just that.

- Arnaldo
 
> >
> >As a policy I think we should go on adding just long options and only
> >after there is a really strong case we should use a short option for
> >really, really popular options.
> 
> And adding options to .perfconfig. Need to use that more.
> 
> David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ