linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.10 130/173] HID: hid-sensor-hub: fix report size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20131202191158.377618130@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Mon,  2 Dec 2013 11:11:53 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 3.10 130/173] HID: hid-sensor-hub: fix report size

3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>

commit d4b1bba76171cb783e32441b28462fe841073ed8 upstream.

Most of the hid sensor field size is reported in report_size field
in the report descriptor. For rotation fusion sensor the quaternion
data is 16 byte field, the report size was set to 4 and report
count field is set to 4. So the total size is 16 bytes. But the current
driver has a bug and not taking account for report count field. This
causes user space to see only 4 bytes of data sent via IIO interface.
The number of bytes in a field needs to take account of report_count
field. Need to multiply report_size and report_count to get total
number of bytes.

Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c |   13 ++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c
@@ -327,7 +327,8 @@ int sensor_hub_input_get_attribute_info(
 				field->logical == attr_usage_id) {
 				sensor_hub_fill_attr_info(info, i, report->id,
 					field->unit, field->unit_exponent,
-					field->report_size);
+					field->report_size *
+							field->report_count);
 				ret = 0;
 			} else {
 				for (j = 0; j < field->maxusage; ++j) {
@@ -339,7 +340,8 @@ int sensor_hub_input_get_attribute_info(
 							i, report->id,
 							field->unit,
 							field->unit_exponent,
-							field->report_size);
+							field->report_size *
+							field->report_count);
 						ret = 0;
 						break;
 					}
@@ -426,9 +428,10 @@ static int sensor_hub_raw_event(struct h
 		hid_dbg(hdev, "%d collection_index:%x hid:%x sz:%x\n",
 				i, report->field[i]->usage->collection_index,
 				report->field[i]->usage->hid,
-				report->field[i]->report_size/8);
-
-		sz = report->field[i]->report_size/8;
+				(report->field[i]->report_size *
+					report->field[i]->report_count)/8);
+		sz = (report->field[i]->report_size *
+					report->field[i]->report_count)/8;
 		if (pdata->pending.status && pdata->pending.attr_usage_id ==
 				report->field[i]->usage->hid) {
 			hid_dbg(hdev, "data was pending ...\n");


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/