[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <877gbmo8on.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 13:33:12 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf tools: Record sampling time for each entry
Hi Arnaldo,
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 15:49:05 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 11:57:44PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
>> 2013-12-02 (월), 09:39 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo:
>> > Em Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 03:53:18PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
>> > > From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
>> > >
>> > > Calculate elapsed time for each sample and record it. The elapsed
>> > > time is a diff between current sample->time and previous sample->time
>> > > which was saved for each evsel and cpu.
>> >
>> > Can you elaborate on why this is interesting to have? What meaning can
>> > one get from the sample->time - prev_sample->time?
>> >
>> > We need clearer changelogs...
>>
>> Sorry about that.. how about this?
>>
>> Sometimes users might want see a relation between value and time of a
>> sample. And the time itself is a very important information to have.
>> As the sample->period value is a diff of counter values between samples
>> it might make sense to add time-diff between samples into a hist entry.
>>
>> To do that, calculate elapsed time for each sample and record it. The
>> elapsed time is the diff between current sample->time and previous
>> sample->time which was saved for each evsel.
>
> Much better! Thanks, and please consider adding this to the man page as
> well, in a followup patch.
Okay.
>
> I'll add the above explanation to the patch, that, as I could read seems
> to not have had any nak, right?
Right. So will you merge this into your tree with new changelog? I
found that it break build on an old system due to shadowing 'time'
symbol with local one.
I'll send v2 soon with a fix.
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists