linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20131202233131.3f7933d1.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Mon, 2 Dec 2013 23:31:31 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with Linus'
 tree

On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 08:16:04 +0100 Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> wrote:

> Andrew,
> 
> Am Dienstag, 3. Dezember 2013, 12:52:19 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
> > Hi Andrew,
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in
> > arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c between commit 8ed12fcc194d ("um: Rename
> > print_stack_trace to do_stack_trace") from Linus' tree and commit
> > ce89e7878311 ("arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c: rename print_stack_trace()") from
> > the akpm-current tree.
> > 
> > I fixed it up (I used the version fro, Linus' tree) and can carry the fix
> > as necessary (no action is required).
> 
> How comes that this patch landed in your tree, I didn't receive a mail from 
> your bot?

Coz after I wrote it I carefully added cc:richrd@....at ;)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/