lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 3 Dec 2013 15:20:39 +0530
From:	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
To:	<balbi@...com>
CC:	<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	<pawel.moll@....com>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
	<swarren@...dotorg.org>, <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	<rob@...dley.net>, <bcousson@...libre.com>, <tony@...mide.com>,
	<linux@....linux.org.uk>, <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	<s.nawrocki@...sung.com>, <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] usb: dwc3: get "usb_phy" only if the platform
 indicates the presence of PHY's

Hi,

On Tuesday 26 November 2013 03:02 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 08:06:12PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/platform_data.h b/drivers/usb/dwc3/platform_data.h
>>>> index 7db34f0..49ffa6d 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/platform_data.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/platform_data.h
>>>> @@ -24,4 +24,6 @@ struct dwc3_platform_data {
>>>>  	enum usb_device_speed maximum_speed;
>>>>  	enum usb_dr_mode dr_mode;
>>>>  	bool tx_fifo_resize;
>>>> +	bool usb2_phy;
>>>> +	bool usb3_phy;
>>>
>>> This would look better as a quirks flag, then we could:
>>>
>>> unsigned long quirks;
>>> #define DWC3_QUIRK_NO_USB3_PHY	BIT(0)
>>> #define DWC3_QUIRK_NO_USB2_PHY	BIT(1)
>>
>> Should this quirk be used for dt also? Currently we find if it has usb3 phy or
>> usb2 phy from the dt data only. But if we add a quirk, we'll have to add a
>> property to populate the quirk no?
> 
> either we use the quirk, or use the fact that no <&usb2_phy> phandle is
> defined, would work both ways, no ?

In my v3, I've made both to use quirks since we don't want to have separate
mechanism for dt and non-dt stuff to know the presence of a particular PHY.

Thanks
Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ