[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <529DB092.8010307@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 15:51:06 +0530
From: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "mpe@...erman.id.au" <michael@...abs.org>
CC: mikey@...ling.org, michaele@....ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, eranian@...gle.com,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [V3 01/10] perf: New conditional branch filter criteria in branch
stack sampling
On 11/26/2013 03:45 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 11/26/2013 11:36 AM, mpe@...erman.id.au wrote:
>> Ideally your commit subject would contain a verb, preferably in the present
>> tense.
>>
>> I think simply "perf: Add PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND" would be clearer.
>
>
> Sure, will change it.
>
>>
>> On Wed, 2013-16-10 at 06:56:48 UTC, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>> POWER8 PMU based BHRB supports filtering for conditional branches.
>>> This patch introduces new branch filter PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND which
>>> will extend the existing perf ABI. Other architectures can provide
>>> this functionality with either HW filtering support (if present) or
>>> with SW filtering of instructions.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
>>> ---
>>> include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 3 ++-
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
>>> index 0b1df41..5da52b6 100644
>>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
>>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
>>> @@ -160,8 +160,9 @@ enum perf_branch_sample_type {
>>> PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ABORT_TX = 1U << 7, /* transaction aborts */
>>> PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IN_TX = 1U << 8, /* in transaction */
>>> PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_TX = 1U << 9, /* not in transaction */
>>> + PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND = 1U << 10, /* conditional branches */
>>>
>>> - PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_MAX = 1U << 10, /* non-ABI */
>>> + PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_MAX = 1U << 11, /* non-ABI */
>>> };
>>
>> This no longer applies against Linus' tree, you'll need to rebase it.
>
> Okay
Hey Michael,
Looks like the patch still applies on top of Linus's tree. The modified patch with
a new commit subject line can be found here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>From d368096fc51a8da65f2d80ed5090d43cbc269f62 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 12:22:27 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] perf: Add PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND
POWER8 PMU based BHRB supports filtering for conditional branches.
This patch introduces new branch filter PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND which
will extend the existing perf ABI. Other architectures can provide
this functionality with either HW filtering support (if present) or
with SW filtering of instructions.
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
---
include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
index e1802d6..e2d8b8b 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -163,8 +163,9 @@ enum perf_branch_sample_type {
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ABORT_TX = 1U << 7, /* transaction aborts */
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IN_TX = 1U << 8, /* in transaction */
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_TX = 1U << 9, /* not in transaction */
+ PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND = 1U << 10, /* conditional branches */
- PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_MAX = 1U << 10, /* non-ABI */
+ PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_MAX = 1U << 11, /* non-ABI */
};
#define PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PLM_ALL \
--
1.7.11.7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists