linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: ux500_pcm: Differentiate between pdata and DT initialisation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1386066427-6862-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org>
Date:	Tue,  3 Dec 2013 10:27:06 +0000
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	broonie@...nel.org
Cc:	linus.walleij@...aro.org, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: ux500_pcm: Differentiate between pdata and DT initialisation

If booting with full DT support (i.e. DMA too, the last piece of the
puzzle), then we don't need to use the compatible_request_channel call
back or require some of the historical bumph which probably isn't
required by a platform data start-up now either. This will also be
ripped out in upcoming commits.

Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
---
 sound/soc/ux500/ux500_pcm.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/ux500/ux500_pcm.c b/sound/soc/ux500/ux500_pcm.c
index 2f1bdb7..ad0d420 100644
--- a/sound/soc/ux500/ux500_pcm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/ux500/ux500_pcm.c
@@ -134,15 +134,24 @@ static const struct snd_dmaengine_pcm_config ux500_dmaengine_pcm_config = {
 	.prepare_slave_config = ux500_pcm_prepare_slave_config,
 };
 
+static const struct snd_dmaengine_pcm_config ux500_dmaengine_of_pcm_config = {
+	.prepare_slave_config = ux500_pcm_prepare_slave_config,
+};
+
 int ux500_pcm_register_platform(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
+	const struct snd_dmaengine_pcm_config *pcm_config;
+	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
 	int ret;
 
-	ret = snd_dmaengine_pcm_register(&pdev->dev,
-			&ux500_dmaengine_pcm_config,
-			SND_DMAENGINE_PCM_FLAG_NO_RESIDUE |
-			SND_DMAENGINE_PCM_FLAG_COMPAT |
-			SND_DMAENGINE_PCM_FLAG_NO_DT);
+	if (np)
+		pcm_config = &ux500_dmaengine_of_pcm_config;
+	else
+		pcm_config = &ux500_dmaengine_pcm_config;
+
+	ret = snd_dmaengine_pcm_register(&pdev->dev, pcm_config,
+					 SND_DMAENGINE_PCM_FLAG_NO_RESIDUE |
+					 SND_DMAENGINE_PCM_FLAG_COMPAT);
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev,
 			"%s: ERROR: Failed to register platform '%s' (%d)!\n",
-- 
1.8.3.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/