[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1386074112-30754-4-git-send-email-alex.shi@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 20:35:12 +0800
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org>
To: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, morten.rasmussen@....com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
fweisbec@...il.com, linux@....linux.org.uk, tony.luck@...el.com,
fenghua.yu@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, arjan@...ux.intel.com, pjt@...gle.com,
fengguang.wu@...el.com
Cc: james.hogan@...tec.com, alex.shi@...aro.org, jason.low2@...com,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, hanjun.guo@...aro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] nohz_full: update cpu load fix in nohz_full
We are not always 0 when update nohz cpu load, after nohz_full enabled.
But current code still treat the cpu as idle. that is incorrect.
Fix it to use correct cpu_load.
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org>
---
kernel/sched/proc.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/proc.c b/kernel/sched/proc.c
index 16f5a30..f1441f0 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/proc.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/proc.c
@@ -568,8 +568,14 @@ void update_cpu_load_nohz(void)
/*
* We were idle, this means load 0, the current load might be
* !0 due to remote wakeups and the sort.
+ * or we may has only one task and in NO_HZ_FULL, then still use
+ * normal cpu load.
*/
- __update_cpu_load(this_rq, 0, pending_updates);
+ if (this_rq->cfs.h_nr_running) {
+ unsigned load = get_rq_runnable_load(this_rq);
+ __update_cpu_load(this_rq, load, pending_updates);
+ } else
+ __update_cpu_load(this_rq, 0, pending_updates);
}
raw_spin_unlock(&this_rq->lock);
}
--
1.8.1.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists