[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1312031350130.24931@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 13:51:40 +0100 (CET)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: Olivier Gay <ogay@...itech.com>
Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nestor Lopez Casado <nlopezcasad@...itech.com>,
Mathieu Meisser <mmeisser@...itech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: logitech-dj: add HIDRAW dependency in Kconfig
On Tue, 3 Dec 2013, Olivier Gay wrote:
> Without hidraw driver, we get this:
>
> <3>[ 210.131988] logitech-djreceiver 0003:046D:C52B.0005: claimed by
> neither input, hiddev nor hidraw
> <3>[ 210.132202] logitech-djreceiver 0003:046D:C52B.0005:
> logi_dj_probe:hid_hw_start returned error
>
> In logi_dj_probe, we call hid_hw_start with HID_CONNECT_DEFAULT
> argument and if hidraw driver is not present, the call fails and we
> return an error in logi_dj_probe.
>
> > It's clear that without hidraw it's not possible to change the pairing
> > from userspace, but I fail to see why probing the receiver should be
> > affected?
>
> As of today, hid-logitech-dj.c depends on hidraw API to work. All HID
> reports sent to control / configure the receiver are sent using hidraw
> API. That's why we fail logi_dj_probe if we cannot connect to hidraw.
Hmm, so unifying receiver is not claimed by hid-input at all?
(HID_CONNECT_DEFAULT also contains HID_CONNECT_HIDINPUT) How so?
(again, I will not be able to test it with my receiver up until the day
after tomorrow).
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists