linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: baytrail: lock IRQs when starting them

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 3 Dec 2013 16:38:08 +0200
From:	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: baytrail: lock IRQs when starting them

On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 03:23:52PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> This uses the new API for tagging GPIO lines as in use by
> IRQs. This enforces a few semantic checks on how the underlying
> GPIO line is used.
> 
> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> ---
> I have no idea how to compile and test this, please help,
> I have high confidence in the patch though.
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
> index 1174ea86b6e9..7ad61c59f34a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
> @@ -372,11 +372,33 @@ static void byt_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
>  {
>  }
>  
> +static unsigned int lp_irq_startup(struct irq_data *d)

This needs to be byt_irq_startup()..

> +{
> +	struct byt_gpio *vg = irq_data_get_irq_handler_data(d);
> +
> +	if (gpio_lock_as_irq(&vg->chip, irqd_to_hwirq(d)))
> +		dev_err(vg->chip.dev,
> +			"unable to lock HW IRQ %lu for IRQ\n",
> +			irqd_to_hwirq(d));
> +	byt_irq_unmask(d);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void lp_irq_shutdown(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> +	struct byt_gpio *vg = irq_data_get_irq_handler_data(d);
> +
> +	byt_irq_mask(d);
> +	gpio_unlock_as_irq(&vg->chip, irqd_to_hwirq(d));
> +}
> +
>  static struct irq_chip byt_irqchip = {
>  	.name = "BYT-GPIO",
>  	.irq_mask = byt_irq_mask,
>  	.irq_unmask = byt_irq_unmask,
>  	.irq_set_type = byt_irq_type,
> +	.irq_startup = byt_irq_startup,

in order to this to compile :)

> +	.irq_shutdown = byt_irq_shutdown,
>  };
>  
>  static void byt_gpio_irq_init_hw(struct byt_gpio *vg)
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/