linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: ux500_pcm: Differentiate between pdata and DT initialisation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131203150755.GZ27568@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 3 Dec 2013 15:07:55 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linus.walleij@...aro.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: ux500_pcm: Differentiate between pdata and DT
 initialisation

On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 10:27:06AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> If booting with full DT support (i.e. DMA too, the last piece of the
> puzzle), then we don't need to use the compatible_request_channel call
> back or require some of the historical bumph which probably isn't
> required by a platform data start-up now either. This will also be
> ripped out in upcoming commits.

Applied both, thanks.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)