[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <529DFA09.1030707@siemens.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 16:34:33 +0100
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
To: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: kvm@...r.kernel.org, scottwood@...escale.com, R65777@...escale.com,
B07421@...escale.com, B08248@...escale.com,
christoffer.dall@...aro.org, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
a.motakis@...tualopensystems.com, agraf@...e.de,
B16395@...escale.com
Subject: Re: [REPOST][PATCH 1/2] driver core: Add new device_driver flag to
allow binding via sysfs only
On 2013-12-03 13:34, Kim Phillips wrote:
> VFIO supports pass-through of devices to user space - for sake
> of illustration, say a PCI e1000 device:
>
> - the e1000 is first unbound from the PCI e1000 driver via sysfs
> - the vfio-pci driver is told via new_id that it now handles e1000 devices
> - the e1000 is explicitly bound to vfio-pci through sysfs
>
> However, now we have two drivers in the system that both handle e1000
> devices. A hotplug event could then occur and it is ambiguous as to which
> driver will claim the device. The desired semantics is that vfio-pci is
> only bound to devices by explicit request in sysfs. This patch makes this
> possible by introducing a sysfs_bind_only flag in struct device_driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@...escale.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@...aro.org>
> ---
> rebased onto 3.13-rc2, and reposted from first submission which
> recieved no comments:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/11/53
>
> drivers/base/dd.c | 5 ++++-
> include/linux/device.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
> index 0605176..b83b16d 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/dd.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
> @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ static int __device_attach(struct device_driver *drv, void *data)
> {
> struct device *dev = data;
>
> - if (!driver_match_device(drv, dev))
> + if (drv->sysfs_bind_only || !driver_match_device(drv, dev))
> return 0;
>
> return driver_probe_device(drv, dev);
> @@ -476,6 +476,9 @@ static int __driver_attach(struct device *dev, void *data)
> */
> int driver_attach(struct device_driver *drv)
> {
> + if (drv->sysfs_bind_only)
> + return 0;
> +
> return bus_for_each_dev(drv->bus, NULL, drv, __driver_attach);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(driver_attach);
> diff --git a/include/linux/device.h b/include/linux/device.h
> index 952b010..ed441d1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/device.h
> +++ b/include/linux/device.h
> @@ -200,6 +200,7 @@ extern struct klist *bus_get_device_klist(struct bus_type *bus);
> * @owner: The module owner.
> * @mod_name: Used for built-in modules.
> * @suppress_bind_attrs: Disables bind/unbind via sysfs.
> + * @sysfs_bind_only: Only allow bind/unbind via sysfs.
> * @of_match_table: The open firmware table.
> * @acpi_match_table: The ACPI match table.
> * @probe: Called to query the existence of a specific device,
> @@ -233,6 +234,7 @@ struct device_driver {
> const char *mod_name; /* used for built-in modules */
>
> bool suppress_bind_attrs; /* disables bind/unbind via sysfs */
> + bool sysfs_bind_only; /* only allow bind/unbind via sysfs */
>
> const struct of_device_id *of_match_table;
> const struct acpi_device_id *acpi_match_table;
>
I think I only discussed this with Stuart in person at the KVM Forum:
Why not deriving the property "sysfs bind only" from the fact that a
device does wild-card binding? Are there use cases that benefit from
decoupling both features?
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists