lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <529EC1FD.2080806@nvidia.com>
Date:	Wed, 4 Dec 2013 11:17:41 +0530
From:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
To:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
CC:	"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
	"thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	"ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk" <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: convert device tree files to use key defines

On Wednesday 04 December 2013 01:34 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 12/02/2013 06:09 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>> Use key code macros for all key code refernced for keys.
>>
>> For tegra20-seaboard.dts and tegra20-harmony.dts:
>>    The key comment for key (16th row and 1st column) is KEY_KPSLASH but
>>    code is 0x004e which is the key code for KEY_KPPLUS. As there other
>>    key exist with KY_KPPLUS, I am assuming key code is wrong and comment
>>    is fine. With this assumption, I am keeping the key code as KEY_KPSLASH.
> This looks reasonable, and I'll apply it soon. What is the patch based
> on? Note that I recently sent a patch to fix the sort order of DT nodes
> in all Tegra DT files, which I'll apply early since it's a cleanup, and
> IIRC some of the KBC nodes may have been moved by that patch, so this
> may conflict. I'll see if I can rebase while applying it.
I worked on linux-next of 20131202.

If there is any issue,  I can generate new patch based on the branch 
which you suggest.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ