[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1386136693.3650.48.camel@cliu38-desktop-build>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 13:58:13 +0800
From: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
To: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chuansheng.liu@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH] locking: Giving mutex warning more precisely in case of
!lock->owner
When enabling mutex debugging, in case the imbalanced mutex_unlock()
is called, we still get the warning like below:
[ 364.208284] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->owner != current)
But in that case, it is due to imbalanced mutex_unlock calling, and
the lock->owner is NULL.
Here we can enhance the case to give the warning as below:
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->owner == NULL)
Signed-off-by: Liu, Chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
---
kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c b/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c
index 7e3443f..b2a1b96 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c
@@ -75,7 +75,12 @@ void debug_mutex_unlock(struct mutex *lock)
return;
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->magic != lock);
- DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->owner != current);
+
+ if (!lock->owner)
+ DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->owner == NULL);
+ else
+ DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->owner != current);
+
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!lock->wait_list.prev && !lock->wait_list.next);
mutex_clear_owner(lock);
}
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists