lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1386136693.3650.48.camel@cliu38-desktop-build>
Date:	Wed, 04 Dec 2013 13:58:13 +0800
From:	Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
To:	peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chuansheng.liu@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH] locking: Giving mutex warning more precisely in case of
 !lock->owner


When enabling mutex debugging, in case the imbalanced mutex_unlock()
is called, we still get the warning like below:
[  364.208284] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->owner != current)

But in that case, it is due to imbalanced mutex_unlock calling, and
the lock->owner is NULL.

Here we can enhance the case to give the warning as below:
 DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->owner == NULL)

Signed-off-by: Liu, Chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
---
 kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c |    7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c b/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c
index 7e3443f..b2a1b96 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c
@@ -75,7 +75,12 @@ void debug_mutex_unlock(struct mutex *lock)
 		return;
 
 	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->magic != lock);
-	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->owner != current);
+
+	if (!lock->owner)
+		DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->owner == NULL);
+	else
+		DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->owner != current);
+
 	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!lock->wait_list.prev && !lock->wait_list.next);
 	mutex_clear_owner(lock);
 }
-- 
1.7.9.5



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ