[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1386143115.30493.48.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 23:45:15 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: Aldo Iljazi <mail@...o.io>,
Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>,
w.d.hubbs@...il.com, chris@...-brannons.com, kirk@...sers.ca,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: speakup: synth.c: removed a space
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 10:38 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 06:35:15AM +0200, Aldo Iljazi wrote:
> > Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >
> > > Err, I'd rather make it really visible that the for loop doesn't have
> > > its first statement?
> >
> > Wouldn't it be better if you add a comment there? So it would follow the
> > coding style?
>
> No. Adding obvious comments is more annoying than the space.
>
> This seems like a small bug in checkpatch.pl. Joe, the problem is this
> code:
>
> for ( ; x; x++) {
>
> It's complaining about the space character before the semicolon.
Shrug. checkpatch isn't and can't be perfect.
I think it's for things like
for (;;)
and that's better than
for ( ; ; )
or
for ( ;; )
or
for ( ;;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists