linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: tps6586x: add version detection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 04 Dec 2013 09:40:46 +0100
From:	Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	swarren@...dotorg.org, thierry.reding@...il.com, dev@...xeye.de,
	lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org,
	kai.poggensee@...onic-design.de, sameo@...ux.intel.com,
	linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: tps6586x: add version detection

Am 2013-12-04 09:10, schrieb Lee Jones:
>> +int tps6586x_get_version(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> +	struct tps6586x *tps6586x = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> +
>> +	return tps6586x->version;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tps6586x_get_version);
> 
> I thought Mark suggested that this routine was converted to a 'static
> inline' and moved into the header? Did you not think this was a good
> idea?
As I pointed out in the comment above, the struct tps6586x is in the C
file, so I would need to move that too. That's why I did not made that
change in the end. What do you think, should I still move (and move the
struct too?) 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/