[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131204085953.GC31778@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 09:59:53 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Regression due to 0c44c2d0f459 x86: Use asm goto to implement
better modify_and_test() functions
* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> 0c44c2d0f459 x86: Use asm goto to implement better modify_and_test()
> functions
>
> causes a regression, because it incorrectly changed the constraints of
> bitops.
>
> Specifically, the GEN_BINARY_RMWcc() hardcodes a constraint as "er", but
> it needs to be "Ir" for the bitops themselves. "I" is correct (as
> opposed to "J" even on 64 bits, because we only generate the 64-bit
> version when we have a register operand.
>
> Unfortunately there isn't a way we can get gcc+gas to generate a version
> with an offset pointer.
Does the regression manifest itself in any actual breakage - if yes,
how does it look like? (People experiencing similar symptoms will be
helped by seeing a fix matching their problems.)
Thanks,
ngo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists