linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: tps6586x: add version detection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f1ee272d52d946b211dbcdad68df7815@agner.ch>
Date:	Wed, 04 Dec 2013 12:38:03 +0100
From:	Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	swarren@...dotorg.org, thierry.reding@...il.com, dev@...xeye.de,
	lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org,
	kai.poggensee@...onic-design.de, sameo@...ux.intel.com,
	linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: tps6586x: add version detection

Am 2013-12-04 11:07, schrieb Lee Jones:
> On Wed, 04 Dec 2013, Stefan Agner wrote:
> 
>> Am 2013-12-04 09:10, schrieb Lee Jones:
>> >> +int tps6586x_get_version(struct device *dev)
>> >> +{
>> >> +	struct tps6586x *tps6586x = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> >> +
>> >> +	return tps6586x->version;
>> >> +}
>> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tps6586x_get_version);
>> >
>> > I thought Mark suggested that this routine was converted to a 'static
>> > inline' and moved into the header? Did you not think this was a good
>> > idea?
>> As I pointed out in the comment above, the struct tps6586x is in the C
>> file, so I would need to move that too. That's why I did not made that
>> change in the end. What do you think, should I still move (and move the
>> struct too?)
> 
> Why would the struct have to be moved if the function is inline?

True, the inline I could have done without moving the struct and the
function. Would you like me to create another revision doing this?

But moving the function needs moving of the struct tps6586x
declaration...


[Sorry, this time with answer all]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/