| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 14:04:12 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@...omium.org>,
"Ma, Xindong" <xindong.ma@...el.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Sameer Nanda <snanda@...omium.org>,
Sergey Dyasly <dserrg@...il.com>,
"Tu, Xiaobing" <xiaobing.tu@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] oom_kill: change oom_kill.c to use for_each_thread()
Change oom_kill.c to use for_each_thread() rather than the racy
while_each_thread() which can loop forever if we race with exit.
Note also that most users were buggy even if while_each_thread()
was fine, the task can exit even _before_ rcu_read_lock().
Fortunately the new for_each_thread() only requires the stable
task_struct, so this change fixes both problems.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Sergey Dyasly <dserrg@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Sameer Nanda <snanda@...omium.org>
---
mm/oom_kill.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 1e4a600..96d7945 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static bool has_intersects_mems_allowed(struct task_struct *tsk,
{
struct task_struct *start = tsk;
- do {
+ for_each_thread(start, tsk) {
if (mask) {
/*
* If this is a mempolicy constrained oom, tsk's
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ static bool has_intersects_mems_allowed(struct task_struct *tsk,
if (cpuset_mems_allowed_intersects(current, tsk))
return true;
}
- } while_each_thread(start, tsk);
+ }
return false;
}
@@ -97,14 +97,14 @@ static bool has_intersects_mems_allowed(struct task_struct *tsk,
*/
struct task_struct *find_lock_task_mm(struct task_struct *p)
{
- struct task_struct *t = p;
+ struct task_struct *t;
- do {
+ for_each_thread(p, t) {
task_lock(t);
if (likely(t->mm))
return t;
task_unlock(t);
- } while_each_thread(p, t);
+ }
return NULL;
}
@@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ static struct task_struct *select_bad_process(unsigned int *ppoints,
unsigned long chosen_points = 0;
rcu_read_lock();
- do_each_thread(g, p) {
+ for_each_process_thread(g, p) {
unsigned int points;
switch (oom_scan_process_thread(p, totalpages, nodemask,
@@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ static struct task_struct *select_bad_process(unsigned int *ppoints,
chosen = p;
chosen_points = points;
}
- } while_each_thread(g, p);
+ }
if (chosen)
get_task_struct(chosen);
rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *p, gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,
{
struct task_struct *victim = p;
struct task_struct *child;
- struct task_struct *t = p;
+ struct task_struct *t;
struct mm_struct *mm;
unsigned int victim_points = 0;
static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(oom_rs, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL,
@@ -437,7 +437,7 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *p, gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,
* still freeing memory.
*/
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
- do {
+ for_each_thread(p, t) {
list_for_each_entry(child, &t->children, sibling) {
unsigned int child_points;
@@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *p, gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,
get_task_struct(victim);
}
}
- } while_each_thread(p, t);
+ }
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
rcu_read_lock();
--
1.5.5.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists