[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <529F3983.5000200@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 22:17:39 +0800
From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
To: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>, patches@...aro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org, Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>,
Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC part1 PATCH 4/7] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce the skeleton of
_PDC related for ARM64
On 2013年12月04日 00:53, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> O> +enum idle_boot_override { IDLE_NO_OVERRIDE = 0, IDLE_HALT, IDLE_NOMWAIT,
>> + IDLE_POLL, IDLE_FORCE_MWAIT };
> This should probably move out of the arch directory to be a single enum
> including both platforms values. That will make it rather easier to keep
> sane and avoid ifdefs around which definitions are for which processor.
Thank you very much for the suggestion, it makes sense to me, will figure
out how to implement it.
Thanks
Hanjun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists