linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM Coresight: Add address control support for ETM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131204152630.GB12847@kroah.com>
Date:	Wed, 4 Dec 2013 07:26:31 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Adrien Vergé <adrienverge@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"zhangwei(Jovi)" <jovi.zhangwei@...wei.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM Coresight: Add address control support for ETM

On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 11:40:25PM -0500, Adrien Vergé wrote:
> In the same manner as for enabling tracing, an entry is created
> in sysfs to set the address range that triggers tracing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adrien Vergé <adrienverge@...il.com>
> Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: "zhangwei(Jovi)" <jovi.zhangwei@...wei.com>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/kernel/etm.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/etm.c b/arch/arm/kernel/etm.c
> index bd7e8e4..a72382b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/etm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/etm.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,8 @@ struct tracectx {
>   struct device *dev;
>   struct clk *emu_clk;
>   struct mutex mutex;
> + unsigned long addrrange_start;
> + unsigned long addrrange_end;
>  };

All of the tabs were eaten by your email client, making this patch
impossible to apply to anything :(

> @@ -53,6 +55,13 @@ static inline bool trace_isrunning(struct tracectx *t)
>   return !!(t->flags & TRACER_RUNNING);
>  }
> 
> +/*
> + * Setups ETM to trace only when:
> + *   - address between start and end
> + *     or address not between start and end (if exclude)
> + *   - trace executed instructions
> + *     or trace loads and stores (if data)
> + */
>  static int etm_setup_address_range(struct tracectx *t, int n,
>   unsigned long start, unsigned long end, int exclude, int data)
>  {
> @@ -115,8 +124,8 @@ static int trace_start(struct tracectx *t)
>   return -EFAULT;
>   }
> 
> - etm_setup_address_range(t, 1, (unsigned long)_stext,
> - (unsigned long)_etext, 0, 0);
> + etm_setup_address_range(t, 1, t->addrrange_start, t->addrrange_end,
> + 0, 0);
>   etm_writel(t, 0, ETMR_TRACEENCTRL2);
>   etm_writel(t, 0, ETMR_TRACESSCTRL);
>   etm_writel(t, 0x6f, ETMR_TRACEENEVT);
> @@ -532,6 +541,37 @@ static ssize_t trace_mode_store(struct kobject *kobj,
>  static struct kobj_attribute trace_mode_attr =
>   __ATTR(trace_mode, 0644, trace_mode_show, trace_mode_store);
> 
> +static ssize_t trace_addrrange_show(struct kobject *kobj,
> +    struct kobj_attribute *attr,
> +    char *buf)
> +{
> + return sprintf(buf, "%08lx - %08lx\n", tracer.addrrange_start,
> +       tracer.addrrange_end);
> +}

None of these should be "kobject" attributes, but rather, device
attributes.

Yes, I know you didn't create this mess, but it needs to be cleaned up.

All of these need to be moved to use the correct kernel apis, and
kobject attributes are not the correct ones.

What's wrong with the in-kernel tracing api?  Why do we have some other
random tracing api and character device stuck in an arch specific
directory where no one has ever looked at it, and it's not even
documented in Documentation/ABI/ like it is supposed to be?

In my opinion, this "driver" needs to be deleted or massively cleaned
up, as it's the wrong api for the functionality it is trying to provide.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/