linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH v3 02/19] Revert "smp: Fix SMP function call empty cpu mask race"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu,  5 Dec 2013 00:12:53 +0800
From:	Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com>,
	Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Jiri Kosina <trivial@...nel.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 02/19] Revert "smp: Fix SMP function call empty cpu mask race"

This reverts commit f44310b98ddb7f0d06550d73ed67df5865e3eda5.

Commit f44310b98ddb7 "smp: Fix SMP function call empty cpu mask race"
introduced field call_function_data->cpumask_ipi to resolve a race
condition in smp_call_function_many().

Later commit 9a46ad6d6df3 "smp: make smp_call_function_many() use logic
similar to smp_call_function_single()" fixed the same issue in another
way when optimizing smp_call_function_many(), which then obsoletes
changes introduced by commit f44310b98ddb7. So revert it.

Acked-by: Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
---
 kernel/smp.c | 16 ++--------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
index 442d514..25c19af 100644
--- a/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/kernel/smp.c
@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ enum {
 struct call_function_data {
 	struct call_single_data	__percpu *csd;
 	cpumask_var_t		cpumask;
-	cpumask_var_t		cpumask_ipi;
 };
 
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct call_function_data, cfd_data);
@@ -47,9 +46,6 @@ hotplug_cfd(struct notifier_block *nfb, unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
 		if (!zalloc_cpumask_var_node(&cfd->cpumask, GFP_KERNEL,
 				cpu_to_node(cpu)))
 			return notifier_from_errno(-ENOMEM);
-		if (!zalloc_cpumask_var_node(&cfd->cpumask_ipi, GFP_KERNEL,
-				cpu_to_node(cpu)))
-			return notifier_from_errno(-ENOMEM);
 		cfd->csd = alloc_percpu(struct call_single_data);
 		if (!cfd->csd) {
 			free_cpumask_var(cfd->cpumask);
@@ -64,7 +60,6 @@ hotplug_cfd(struct notifier_block *nfb, unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
 	case CPU_DEAD:
 	case CPU_DEAD_FROZEN:
 		free_cpumask_var(cfd->cpumask);
-		free_cpumask_var(cfd->cpumask_ipi);
 		free_percpu(cfd->csd);
 		break;
 #endif
@@ -245,9 +240,9 @@ int smp_call_function_single(int cpu, smp_call_func_t func, void *info,
 				csd = &__get_cpu_var(csd_data);
 
 			csd_lock(csd);
-
 			csd->func = func;
 			csd->info = info;
+
 			generic_exec_single(cpu, csd, wait);
 		} else {
 			err = -ENXIO;	/* CPU not online */
@@ -399,13 +394,6 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask,
 	if (unlikely(!cpumask_weight(cfd->cpumask)))
 		return;
 
-	/*
-	 * After we put an entry into the list, cfd->cpumask may be cleared
-	 * again when another CPU sends another IPI for a SMP function call, so
-	 * cfd->cpumask will be zero.
-	 */
-	cpumask_copy(cfd->cpumask_ipi, cfd->cpumask);
-
 	for_each_cpu(cpu, cfd->cpumask) {
 		struct call_single_data *csd = per_cpu_ptr(cfd->csd, cpu);
 		struct call_single_queue *dst =
@@ -422,7 +410,7 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask,
 	}
 
 	/* Send a message to all CPUs in the map */
-	arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(cfd->cpumask_ipi);
+	arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(cfd->cpumask);
 
 	if (wait) {
 		for_each_cpu(cpu, cfd->cpumask) {
-- 
1.8.1.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/