[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131204161956.GA6094@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 08:19:56 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Jiri Kosina <trivial@...nel.org>,
Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/19] simplify generic cross CPU function call
implementation
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 12:12:51AM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> Since commit 9a46ad6d6df3b54 "smp: make smp_call_function_many() use
> logic similar to smp_call_function_single()", single and multiple
> (mask version) cross CPU function calls are handled in the same way,
> and generic_smp_call_function_interrupt() becomes an aliases of
> generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt(), so only one interrupt
> is needed for arch code to support generic SMP function call interfaces.
> This patch series simplifies arch code by killing the redundant
> interrupt for cross CPU function calls.
>
> We choose to keep generic_smp_call_function_interrupt() instead of
> generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt() because the former is
> more generic.
Maybe drop the generic as well to get the name down to a reasonable
length? :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists