linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 22/41] rcu: Replace __this_cpu_ptr uses with raw_cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 4 Dec 2013 16:37:32 +0000
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, akpm@...uxfoundation.org,
	rostedt@...dmis.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/41] rcu: Replace __this_cpu_ptr uses with
 raw_cpu_ptr

On Tue, 3 Dec 2013, Paul E. McKenney wrote:

> This does not build on 3.13-rc2.  Ah, need a couple of patches earlier
> in the series.
>
> But...  But...  Didn't we recently change -to- __this_cpu_ptr() from
> the older __get_cpu_var()?

We moved from __get_cpu_var to this_cpu_ptr in a earlier patch proposal.
The __this_cpu_ptrs were then decided to have to be called raw_cpu_ptr.
You merged patch from the proposal. The patch was merged a bit too
early into your tree.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/