[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131204173238.GD19087@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 12:32:39 -0500
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
mjg59@...f.ucam.org, greg@...ah.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] kexec: A new system call, kexec_file_load, for in
kernel kexec
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 09:56:57AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 11/20/13 at 12:50pm, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > + * that kexec_mutex is held.
> > + */
>
> I think kexec_add_buffer is guaranteed to be called before allocating
> control pages, why not updating image->control_page after each time
> kexec_add_buffer is called. Then when control page is needed, effective
> address in crash_kernel region can be given. This can be a little more
> efficient.
image->control_page controls the lowest address available for control
pages in crash kernel region. When we do kexec_add_buffer, we don't
necessarily know whether there is an empty page available between
segments or not.
Also, existing logic for kexec does not update the image->control_page
when segments are being copied.
So I think this does not offer any huge benefits and it is not performance
critical path. I will just leave it as it is.
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists