[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4jELNXN7+f2MvD8FuUmvRCbAw7DG=cNMHuPrYWcWAo5BA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 11:17:14 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Qiao Zhou <zhouqiao@...vell.com>
Cc: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
Miao Eric <eric.y.miao@...il.com>,
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"dmaengine@...r.kernel.org" <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
Chao Xie <cxie4@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2 V1] arm-mmp-build-sram-driver-alone
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Qiao Zhou <zhouqiao@...vell.com> wrote:
> On 12/04/2013 07:17 PM, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
>>
>> Dan indicated that you could pack these two patches into one. Whatever
>> it's also OK to use two patches.
>
> Misunderstood it... Thanks for correcting.
>
Please combine the patches for two reasons:
1/ patch1 by itself makes the problem worse it prevents the mmp_tdma
driver from building even if CPU_MMP2 is selected.
2/ patch2 does not have a changelog and is the only user of the
enabling in patch1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists