linux-kernel - Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:616

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20131204232251.73cc62c6.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 4 Dec 2013 23:22:51 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
	Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
 kernel/locking/mutex.c:616

On Thu, 05 Dec 2013 15:12:04 +0800 Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com> wrote:

> > 
> > blam.  spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock) failed to decrement
> > preempt_count().  What the heck.
> > 
> > What architecture is this?  Please send the full .config.
> > 
> > And exactly which kernel version is in use?
> 
> It's a arm7tdmi SoC (GeneralPlus gpl32700 SoC).
> The code is: current Linus' tree + patches for this SoC.
> The patches for this SoC includes:
> irqchip, clocksource, pinctrl, gpio, uart, spi, sd/mmc host drivers.
> I also apply a out-of-tree sdio wifi driver for mt5931 wifi module.

Beats me, sorry - I don't see anything which could cause this in the
arm spinlock implementation, even if the spinlock's storage got
corrupted.

> I can successfully boot and running busybox if using ext2 as root.
> Thus I don't hit "spin_unlock_irq decrement preempt_count failure" if using ext2 as root.
> The storage is a spi nor flash, so I prefer to use jffs2 but then I got
> the hangup.
> 
> BTW, I got below panic today:
> 
> 467: 0
> 470: 0
> 475: 1
> 485: 1
> 487: 2
> 489: 2
> 491: 1
> 494: 1
> 496: 1
> 498: 1
> BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0, spi0/30

Which is what appears to have happened here.

I assume earlier kernels worked OK with this config?

If so, all I can suggest is a git bisection search :(
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/