[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131205080050.GT28413@mwanda>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 11:00:50 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Serban Constantinescu <serban.constantinescu@....com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, arve@...roid.com,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
john.stultz@...aro.org, ccross@...roid.com, Dave.Butcher@....com,
irogers@...gle.com, romlem@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/9] staging: android: binder: Move some of the logic
into subfunction
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 06:09:33PM +0000, Serban Constantinescu wrote:
> +static void bc_dead_binder_done(struct binder_proc *proc,
> + struct binder_thread *thread, void __user *cookie)
> +{
> + struct binder_work *w;
> + struct binder_ref_death *death = NULL;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(w, &proc->delivered_death, entry) {
> + struct binder_ref_death *tmp_death = container_of(w, struct binder_ref_death, work);
Put a blank line after the variable declaration block. Also break it up
into two lines instead of having the lines be a million characters long.
list_for_each_entry(w, &proc->delivered_death, entry) {
struct binder_ref_death *tmp_death;
tmp_death = container_of(w, struct binder_ref_death, work);
> + if (tmp_death->cookie == cookie) {
> + death = tmp_death;
> + return;
Should be a break here. This function wasn't tested.
> + }
> + }
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists