[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131205003201.GB6683@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 01:32:03 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, oleg@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] posix-timers: Remove dead process posix cpu timers
caching
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 01:50:34PM -0500, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > @@ -1090,13 +1063,8 @@ void posix_cpu_timer_schedule(struct k_itimer *timer)
> > timer->it.cpu.expires = 0;
> > goto out_unlock;
> > } else if (unlikely(p->exit_state) && thread_group_empty(p)) {
> > - /*
> > - * We've noticed that the thread is dead, but
> > - * not yet reaped. Take this opportunity to
> > - * drop our task ref.
> > - */
> > + /* Optimizations: if the process is dying, no need to rearm */
> > cpu_timer_sample_group(timer->it_clock, p, &now);
>
> Why do we still need to call cpu_timer_sample_group? You removed to below line which uses
> "now".
Good point, it looks safe to remove it now.
Thanks.
> > - clear_dead_task(timer, now);
> > goto out_unlock;
> > }
> > spin_lock(&p->sighand->siglock);
> >
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists