linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Remove unnecessarily gendered language

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131205104808.GA6455@amd.pavel.ucw.cz>
Date:	Thu, 5 Dec 2013 11:48:08 +0100
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove unnecessarily gendered language

On Mon 2013-12-02 20:18:52, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> The kernel as a number of cases of gendered language. The majority of these
> refer to objects that don't have gender in English, and so I've replaced
> them with "it" and "its". Some refer to people (developers or users), and
> I've replaced these with the singular "they" variant. Some are simply
> typos that I've fixed up.

Why is this good idea?

I don't think this makes documentation better.

> @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ gid=
>  umask=			Provide default owner, group, and access mode mask.
>  			These options work as documented in mount(8).  By
>  			default, the files/directories are owned by root and
> -			he/she has read and write permissions, as well as
> +			they have read and write permissions, as well as
>  			browse permission for directories.  No one else has any
>  			access permissions.  I.e. the mode on all files is by
>  			default rw------- and for directories rwx------, a

So... we had unambiguous text "user has read and write permissions"
and now you have to wonder if they refers to "user" or
"files/directories".

(And I'm pretty sure most people will parse it the wrong way.)

> @@ -23,7 +24,7 @@ Quota netlink interface
>  When user exceeds a softlimit, runs out of grace time or reaches hardlimit,
>  quota subsystem traditionally printed a message to the controlling terminal of
>  the process which caused the excess. This method has the disadvantage that
> -when user is using a graphical desktop he usually cannot see the message.
> +when user is using a graphical desktop they usually cannot see the
>  message.

Is this even correct english?


NAK, FWIW.
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/