[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131205122851.GB20562@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 13:28:51 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Henrik Austad <henrik@...tad.us>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, josh@...htriplett.org,
niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
darren@...art.com, fweisbec@...il.com, sbw@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 tip/core/locking 0/4] Memory-barrier documentation
updates
* Henrik Austad <henrik@...tad.us> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 02:46:28PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Hello!
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> > This series applies some long-needed updates to memory-barriers.txt:
> >
> > 1. Add ACCESS_ONCE() calls where needed to ensure their inclusion
> > in code copy-and-pasted from this file.
> >
> > 2. Add long atomic examples alongside the existing atomics.
> >
> > 3. Prohibit architectures supporting the Linux kernel from
> > speculating stores.
>
> Just me, or is the 3rd patch missing from lkml?
It had a Cc: list from hell so vger probably rejected it as spam.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists